Epidemiologic Trends and Distributions of Imported Infectious Diseases Among Travelers to Japan Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2016 to 2021: A Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the trends of imported infectious diseases among travelers to non-endemic countries during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This article aimed to describe those among travelers to Japan. METHODS: This is a descriptive study based on national surveillance data. Imported infectious disease cases were defined as those with a reported overseas source of infection among 15 diseases pre-selected based on the probability and impact of importation. The number of notified cases from April 2016 to March 2021 were described by disease and time of diagnosis. The relative ratio and absolute difference in case counts-both by number and per arrival-were calculated by disease comparing those from the pandemic period (April 2020-March 2021) to the pre-pandemic period (April 2016-March 2020). RESULTS: A total of 3,524 imported infectious disease cases were diagnosed during the study period, including 3,439 cases before and 85 cases during the pandemic. The proportionate distribution of diseases changed but notification counts of all 15 diseases decreased during the pandemic. Accounting for arrivals, however, seven diseases showed a two-fold or greater increase, with a notable absolute increase per million arrivals for amebiasis (60.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 41.5-78.7), malaria (21.7; 95% CI, 10.5-33.0), and typhoid fever (9.3; 95% CI, 1.9-16.8). CONCLUSION: The epidemiology of imported infectious diseases changed during the pandemic. While the number of imported infectious disease cases decreased, the number of cases per arrivals increased considerably both in relative and absolute terms for several diseases of public health and clinical importance.

Serum Testosterone Is Associated With the Severity of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is more likely to be severe in men than in women. Its association with sex hormones as an aggravating factor for male patients has been attracting attention. This study aimed to investigate whether serum testosterone is associated with the aggravation of COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum testosterone concentrations in 116 male patients with COVID-19 and residual serum were measured and examined upon their admission to Sapporo Medical University Hospital between February 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021. RESULTS: Blood samples collected from these patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. The serum testosterone levels were 2.19±1.35, 1.29±0.88, and 0.75±0.58 ng/ml in mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. Patients with severe COVID-19 on admission had lower testosterone levels (p<0.001). At a cutoff level of 1.31 ng/ml, the area under the curve for the comparison of severe with non-severe cases was 0.825. Furthermore, serum testosterone levels negatively correlated with C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A levels but positively correlated with calcium, zinc, C3, and C4. CONCLUSION: In male patients with COVID-19, low serum testosterone levels correlated with disease severity, accompanied by a strong inflammatory reaction and proportion of complement consumption.

Tazobactam/ceftolozane and tobramycin combination therapy in extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in severe burn injury: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with tazobactam/ceftolozane (TAZ/CTLZ) and high-dose aminoglycosides has been reported to be efficacious in extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. However, there are no reports of efficacy in XDR-P. aeruginosa infection for combination therapy with low-dose aminoglycosides and TAZ/CTLZ. Herein, we describe a rare case of severe burn injury patients with persistent bacteremia due to XDR-P. aeruginosa, which was successfully treated with TAZ/CTLZ and low-dose tobramycin (TOB). CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old man was admitted to the intensive care unit with severe burn injury involving 52% of the total body surface area and a prognostic burn index of 79.5. The patient had recurrent bacterial infections since admission, and blood cultures collected on the 37th day of admission revealed the presence of P. aeruginosa strains that were resistant to all ß-lactams and amikacin (AMK). The results of the antimicrobial synergistic study showed no synergistic effect of low-dose meropenem (MEPM) and AMK combination therapy. The patient had acute renal failure, and it was difficult to increase the dose of MEPM and AMK, respectively. Thus, we initiated TAZ/CTLZ 1.5 g/8 h instead of the AMK and MEPM combination therapy on the 43rd day of hospitalization. Low-dose TAZ/CTLZ was continued because of prolonged renal dysfunction and resulted in a transient clinical improvement. However, the dosage of TAZ/CTLZ could be increased as the renal function improved, but despite an increased TAZ/CTLZ dose, bacteremia persisted, and the blood cultures remained positive. Thus, TOB was added to TAZ/CTLZ at low doses for synergistic effect against Gram-negative bacteria. Blood cultures collected after initiation of combination therapy with TAZ/CTLZ and low-dose TOB were negative on two consecutive follow-up evaluations. Thereafter, although the patient had several episodes of fever and increased inflammatory response, blood cultures consistently tested negative, and all of the wounds healed. On the 93rd day, due to the good healing progress, the patient was transferred to another hospital. CONCLUSIONS: TAZ/CTLZ and low-dose TOB combination therapy showed the potential for synergistic effects. Our present report suggests a novel synergistic treatment strategy for rare cases that are refractory to the treatment of infections, such as XDR-P. aeruginosa infection.

Factors affecting the sensitivity of quantitative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigen test.

INTRODUCTION: The accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) is affected by various factors; however, studies examining the factors affecting the accuracy of quantitative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen test (QAT) are limited. METHODS: A total of 347 nasopharyngeal samples were collected from patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and the date of onset was obtained from the electronic medical records. The SARS-CoV-2 antigen level was measured using Lumipulse Presto SARS-CoV-2 Ag (Presto), while NAAT was performed using the Ampdirect 2019-nCoV Detection Kit. RESULTS: Presto had a sensitivity rate of 95.1% (95% confidence interval: 92.8-97.4) in detecting the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in 347 samples. The number of days from symptom onset to sample collection was negatively correlated with the amount of antigen (r = -0.515) and sensitivity of Presto (r = -0.711). The patients' age was lower in the Presto-negative samples (median age, 39 years) compared with that in the Presto-positive samples (median age, 53 years; p < 0.01). A significant positive correlation was observed between age (excluding teenagers) and Presto sensitivity (r = 0.764). Meanwhile, no association was found between the mutant strain, sex, and Presto results. CONCLUSION: Presto is useful for the accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 owing to its high sensitivity when the number of days from symptom onset to sample collection is within 12 days. Furthermore, age may affect the results of Presto, and this tool has a relatively low sensitivity in younger patients.

Pseudo-outbreak of Mycobacterium lentiflavum at a general hospital in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium lentiflavum is a slow-growing nontuberculous mycobacterium that is widely distributed in soil and water systems, but it is sometimes pathogenic to humans. Although cases of M. lentiflavum infections are rare, 22 isolates of M. lentiflavum were identified at a single hospital in Japan. We suspected a nosocomial outbreak; thus, we conducted transmission pattern and genotype analyses. METHODS: Cases of M. lentiflavum isolated at Kushiro City General Hospital in Japan between May 2020 and April 2021 were analyzed. The patient samples and environmental culture specimens underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Additionally, we retrospectively collected clinical data from patient medical records. RESULTS: Altogether, 22 isolates of M. lentiflavum were identified from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Clinically, the instances with M. lentiflavum isolates were considered contaminants. In the WGS analysis, 19 specimens, including 18 patient samples and 1 environmental culture from the hospital's faucet, showed genetic similarity. The frequency of M. lentiflavum isolation decreased after we prohibited the use of taps where M. lentiflavum was isolated. CONCLUSIONS: WGS analysis identified that the cause of M. lentiflavum pseudo-outbreak was the water used for patient examinations, including bronchoscopy.

Analysis of diagnostic performance and factors causing nonspecific reactions in SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests.

INTRODUCTION: Early diagnosis and appropriate infection control are important to prevent the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In this study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests and the factors that cause nonspecific reactions. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swab specimens (n = 100), sputum specimens (n = 10), and lithium-heparin plasma samples (n = 100) were collected. We evaluated Espline®SARS-CoV-2 (Espline) and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test that also known as STANDARD Q® (STANDARD Q), with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Lumipulse® Presto SARS-CoV-2 Ag as reference tests. In addition, we investigated the effects of inadequate pretreatment methods and five potential causes of nonspecific reactions. RESULTS: The sensitivities of Espline and STANDARD Q were 60% and 57%, respectively, and their specificity was 100%. It was confirmed that the judgment line for the positive insufficiently mixed specimens was faint. A false-positive result was observed with STANDARD Q when sputum was used as a specimen to investigate judgment the effect of viscosity. CONCLUSIONS: Espline and STANDARD Q show good sensitivity for specimens with Ct values less than 25, but specimens collected within 9 days of symptom onset may still give false negatives. The test should be performed carefully, and the results should be judged comprehensively, taking into account clinical symptoms and patient background.

Genotypes and transmission routes of noroviruses causing sporadic acute gastroenteritis among adults and children, Japan, 2015-2019.

Noroviruses (NoVs) are major causes of acute viral gastroenteritis at all ages worldwide. The molecular epidemiology of sporadic cases remains poorly understood, especially in adults. Additionally, no studies have analyzed the transmission route in sporadic acute gastroenteritis. In this study, we investigated cases of very mild sporadic NoV acute gastroenteritis in adults (medical staff) who do not visit the outpatient clinic and child outpatients. We also evaluated genotype differences between adults and children and possible transmission routes in adults during 5 years. The number of NoV positives were 58 in adults and 124 in children. In adults, the NoV positivity rate in this study was higher (64.4%) than that in previous reports of outpatients (10%) and inpatients (5%) in the United State. This finding suggested that the NoV positivity rate might be high in adults with very mild acute gastroenteritis. In adults, human-to-human transmission rates from children and food-borne transmission (raw oysters) were 21.6% (11/51) and 19.6% (10/51), respectively. Among adults, GII.2, GII.4, and GII.17 were the predominant genotypes, with rates of 32.7%, 30.9%, and 21.8%, respectively. Among children, GII.4 and GII.2 were the predominant genotypes, with rates of 45.5% and 40.6%, respectively. GII.17 was only detected in 0.8% (1/123) of children. Trends in NoV genotypes are expected to differ depending on the patient's age. Investigating sporadic cases including the patient's background (age and transmission route) may be helpful to monitor the trend of NoV strains, forecast prevalent NoV GII genotypes, and develop NoV vaccines.

Viral load may impact the diagnostic performance of nasal swabs in nucleic acid amplification test and quantitative antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

INTRODUCTION: Compared to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), there has been insufficient evaluation of the diagnostic performance of nasal swabs (NS) for the detection of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) and quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test (QAT). METHODS: We prospectively compared healthcare worker-collected and flocked NS within nine days after symptom onset to paired NPS to detect SARS-CoV-2 in NAAT and QAT on the fully automated Lumipulse system. The agreement between sample types was evaluated, and cycle threshold (Ct) values and antigen levels were used as surrogate viral load measures. RESULTS: Sixty sets of NPS and NS samples were collected from 40 patients with COVID-19. The overall agreements between NAAT and QAT samples were 76.7% and 65.0%, respectively. In NAAT, the Ct value of NS was significantly higher, 5.9, than that of NPS. Thirty-nine (95.1%) NS tested positive in 41 positive-paired NPS with Ct ≤ 30. The negative correlation was observed between antigen levels of NS in QAT and Ct values of NS in NAAT (r = -0.88). In QAT, the antigen level of NS was significantly lower than that of NPS. Thirty-six (90.0%) NS tested positive in 40 positive-paired NPS with antigen levels >100 pg/mL, which were collected significantly earlier than those with antigen levels ≤100 pg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: In NAAT and QAT, NS had limited performance in detecting SARS-CoV-2 compared to NPS. However, NS may be helpful for patients with COVID-19 with high viral loads or those in the early stages of the illness.

Performance analysis among multiple fully automated anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody measurement reagents: A potential indicator for the correlation of protection in the antibody titer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the performance of various reagents in automated analyzers for antibody detection against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: Using 100 serum samples from 100 individual patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the precision, linearity, determination agreement, and correlation of five qualitative reagents (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2, ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG, ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgM, Access SARS-CoV-2 IgM, and SARS-CoV-2 IgM) and four quantitative reagents (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S, ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG II, Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG 1st IS, and SARS-COV-2 IgG S) were analyzed. A surrogate virus-neutralizing test (sVNT) kit was used to evaluate the measurement value of each quantitative reagent corresponding to the amount of neutralizing antibody, similar to that of patients in the late stage of infection. RESULTS: Precision and linearity were found to be sufficient for clinical use. Five discrepant samples were observed in the positive and negative judgments of the qualitative reagents for IgG, and one discrepant sample was observed in the qualitative reagent for IgM. Although the measurement values of the quantitative reagents were different, they were correlated with each reagent. The reference values inferred from the sVNT were Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2: 71.8 U/L, ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgGⅡ: 2976.3 AU/mL, Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG 1st IS: 689.6 IU/mL, and SARS-CoV-2 IgG S: 19.3 U/L. CONCLUSIONS: The performance observed for each anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection reagent was sufficient. The reference values based on the inhibition rate of sVNT have potential as indicators of the correlation of protection and are expected to be leveraged in automated antibody tests.

Comparative study of rapid antigen testing and two nucleic acid amplification tests for influenza virus detection.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate rapid antigen detection (RAD) and rapid nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to detect influenza virus (IV). METHODS: The conventional RAD test (Quick Chaser Flu A, B: QC), using silver amplified immunochromatography (Quick Chaser Auto Flu A, B: QCA), as well as two NAATs (Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV: Xpert, cobas Influenza A/B & RSV: cobas) were evaluated using nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected cases of influenza. A reference method was performed using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction according to the manual of the Japanese National Institute of Infectious Disease (NIID). RESULTS: From a total of 177 samples, 51 were positive according to the NIID assay. The kappa (κ) coefficient in Xpert and cobas for influenza A virus (IAV)/influenza B virus (IBV) was 1.00, which was the highest among the four detection assays. However, the κ coefficients in QC and QCA for IAV/IBV were 0.71-0.77 and 0.87-0.89, respectively. The sensitivities of the RAD tests were 41.7% in QC and 50.0% in QCA at < 6 h after onset, and 100.0% in both QC and QCA at 24-48 h after onset. The cycle threshold (Ct) values were significantly lower in the group in which all detection assays were positive for IAV. CONCLUSIONS: Xpert and cobas have comparable analytical performances and are highly useful as influenza virus detection assays. QC and QCA could show false negatives frequently in the early stage of infection and when viral load is low.

Does the timing of saliva collection affect the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection?

We evaluated the optimal timing of saliva sample collection to diagnose the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We obtained 150 saliva samples at four specific time points from 13 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The time points were (1) early morning (immediately after waking), (2) immediately after breakfast before tooth brushing, (3) 2 h after breakfast, and (4) before lunch. On the 2nd hospital day, patients collected saliva at the four time points by themselves. We collected samples at two time points, (1) and (3), from the 3rd hospital day to day 9 following symptom onset. In 52 samples collected at the four time points, there was no significant difference. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the positive proportion or the viral load between the two time points in both analyses by the day from symptom onset and by all samples. In this study, there was no difference in the positive proportions in saliva collected at various time points within 9 days after symptom onset. The timing of saliva collection was not affected by the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Delayed dexamethasone treatment at initiation of oxygen supplementation for coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with the exacerbation of clinical condition.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) frequently causes inflammatory lung injury as its symptoms progress. While dexamethasone reportedly reduces inflammation and prevents progression to respiratory failure, the appropriate time to administer dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 remains unclear. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study, where we consecutively enrolled patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who received oxygen and oral dexamethasone (n = 85). We assessed the association between the number of days to the initiation of dexamethasone and the cumulative rate of exacerbation defined as death or initiation of mechanical ventilation within 28 days of symptom onset. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off value from the initiation of oxygen supplementation to that of dexamethasone administration was two days (sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 59%), whereas that from oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 95% to the initiation of dexamethasone administration was five days (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 59%). adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index score, time of oxygen supplementation (two or more days), and SpO2 < 95% (five or more days), Cox regression analysis results showed that delayed dexamethasone administration since the initiation of oxygen supplementation was significantly associated with a higher risk of death or greater need for mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio: 5.51, 95% confidence interval, 1.79-16.91). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia, early administration of dexamethasone, preferably less than two days from initiation of oxygen supplementation, may be required to improve clinical outcomes.

Self-reported Smell and Taste Disorders in Patients With COVID-19: A Japanese Single-center Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Smell and taste disorders are among the most common symptoms of COVID-19. However, the relationship between smell and taste disorders and systemic symptoms is not fully understood in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 105 of 111 COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized at our hospital between March and July 2020 in Japan. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (response rate: 70.5%) completed the survey. Of these, six patients (8.1%) presented with smell disorders only, 16 (21.6%) presented with taste disorders only, and 17 (23.0%) presented with both smell and taste disorders. The mean Visual Analog Scale for smell and taste was 0.5 and 20, respectively, at the time of the most severe symptoms. CONCLUSION: Among COVID-19 patients in Japan, smell and taste disorders are often followed by fever and may not be the first symptoms. Sense of smell is particularly impaired. These symptoms often improve, although they sometimes persist for a long time as sequelae.

Evaluation of false positives in the SARS-CoV-2 quantitative antigen test.

INTRODUCTION: Highly sensitive reagents for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigens have been developed for accurate and rapid diagnosis till date. In this study, we aim to clarify the frequency of false-positive reactions and reveal their details in SARS-CoV-2 quantitative antigen test using an automated laboratory device. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swab samples (n = 4992) and saliva samples (n = 5430) were collected. We measured their SARS-CoV-2 antigen using Lumipulse® Presto SARS-CoV-2 Ag and performed a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) using the Ampdirect™ 2019 Novel Coronavirus Detection Kit as needed. The results obtained from each detection test were compared accordingly. RESULTS: There were 304 nasopharyngeal samples and 114 saliva samples were positive in the Lumipulse® Presto SARS-CoV-2 Ag test. All positive nasopharyngeal samples in the antigen test were also positive for NAAT. In contrast, only three (2.6%) of all the positive saliva samples in the antigen test were negative for NAAT. One showed no linearity with a dilute solution in the dilution test. Additionally, the quantitative antigen levels of all the three samples did not decrease after reaction with the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody. CONCLUSIONS: The judgment difference between the quantitative antigen test and NAAT seemed to be caused by non-specific reactions in the antigen test. Although the high positive and negative predictive value of this quantitative antigen test could be confirmed, we should consider the possibility of false-positives caused by non-specific reactions and understand the characteristics of antigen testing. We recommend that repeating centrifugation before measurement, especially in saliva samples, should be performed appropriately.

Transmission dynamics of a linear vanA-plasmid during a nosocomial multiclonal outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a non-endemic area, Japan.

The spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is a major threat in nosocomial settings. A large-scale multiclonal VRE outbreak has rarely been reported in Japan due to low VRE prevalence. We evaluated the transmission of vancomycin resistance in a multiclonal VRE outbreak, conducted biological and genomic analyses of VRE isolates, and assessed the implemented infection control measures. In total, 149 patients harboring VanA-type VRE were identified from April 2017 to October 2019, with 153 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolated being grouped into 31 pulsotypes using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, wherein six sequence types belonged to clonal complex 17. Epidemic clones varied throughout the outbreak; however, they all carried vanA-plasmids (pIHVA). pIHVA is a linear plasmid, carrying a unique structural Tn1546 containing vanA; it moves between different Enterococcus spp. by genetic rearrangements. VRE infection incidence among patients in the "hot spot" ward correlated with the local VRE colonization prevalence. Local prevalence also correlated with vancomycin usage in the ward. Transmission of a novel transferrable vanA-plasmid among Enterococcus spp. resulted in genomic diversity in VRE in a non-endemic setting. The prevalence of VRE colonization and vancomycin usage at the ward level may serve as VRE cross-transmission indicators in non-intensive care units for outbreak control.

Determination of reactivation rate and risk factors for Hepatitis B virus reactivation in low-positive cases: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: In quantitative assays for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, although the amplification reaction signal is detected for low-positive cases, quantification remains challenging. HBV reactivation has been reported in many studies, but only a few have focused on HBV low-positive cases. This study aimed to determine the reactivation rate and risk factors for HBV reactivation in low-positive cases. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 7498 patients who had their HBV DNA measured at Sapporo Medical University Hospital between April 2008 and November 2020. Patient selection criteria were defined as follows: hepatitis B surface antigen was negative; HBV DNA was detectable but not quantifiable at least once. HBV DNA was monitored according to the guidelines for HBV reactivation. RESULTS: In total, 49,086 HBV DNA quantitative tests were performed. HBV DNA levels of 2578 tests were detectable but not quantifiable. Eighty patients met the criteria in this study. The median observation period was 497 days, and the 2-year reactivation rate was 15%. Ten patients had low HBV DNA positivity at baseline. Malignant lymphoma was observed in 15 patients; chemotherapy was used to treat other solid tumors in 35 patients, and immunosuppressive therapy was used in 30 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that HBV DNA detected below the quantification level at baseline was an independent risk factor for HBV reactivation (adjusted hazard ratio 5.82; P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low HBV DNA positivity, especially at baseline, are at high risk for HBV reactivation and therefore require closer monitoring.

Invasive pneumococcal disease affected the fatal outcome in a COVID-19 patient.

A 68-year-old man experienced fever and cough and was referred to a hospital for day 4. He had a positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. On day 12, his PaO2/FiO2 ratio worsened to 120 and he was transferred to Sapporo Medical University Hospital for treatment using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Venous blood cultures were positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae, which were serotype 3, mucoid-type, and penicillin susceptible. Coinfections with coronavirus disease-2019 and invasive pneumococcal disease are rare; however, they are associated with a higher case fatality than either of the conditions manifesting alone.

Early favipiravir treatment was associated with early defervescence in non-severe COVID-19 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The antiviral drug favipiravir has been shown to have in vitro antiviral activity against severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). In this study, we investigated the clinical benefits and initiation of favipiravir treatment in patients with non-severe coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This study was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to calculate the area under the curve, and the optimal cut-off values for the time to initiate favipiravir treatment were calculated to predict defervescence within seven days. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify potential influencing factors of defervescence. This was defined as a body temperature of less than 37 °C for at least 2 days. RESULTS: Data from 41 patients were used for the efficacy assessment. The days from the onset of fever to defervescence showed a positive correlation with the duration from the onset of fever to initiation of favipiravir treatment (r = 0.548, P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value was the administration of favipiravir on day 4. Patients were assigned to two groups based on the optimal cut-off value from onset to initiation of favipiravir treatment: early treatment group (within 4-days) and late treatment group (more than 4-days). In the multivariate analysis, when adjusted for age, sex, and days from onset to initiation of favipiravir treatment, the significant factors were male sex and days of initiation of the favipiravir treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that if favipiravir is to be used for treatment, it should be initiated as early as possible.

Evaluation of two commercial molecular diagnostic assays: The Xpert Norovirus and the TRCReady NV.

INTRODUCTION: Norovirus is highly contagious, and a few particles of this virus are sufficient to make people sick. It is desirable to develop quick and accurate laboratory methods to detect norovirus. METHODS: We evaluated two commercial molecular diagnostic assays, the Xpert Norovirus and the TRCReady NV, using clinical fecal samples. A reference method was performed using in-house real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR). RESULTS: The results of the real-time RT-PCR analysis of 60 suspected cases of norovirus infection showed 5 cases of Genogroup I (GI) positives and 21 cases of GII positives, among which was 1 GI and GII coinfection. The viral titers of the norovirus-positive samples ranged from 1.54 × 101 to 3.14 × 108 copies/µL. Norovirus GII.17 (12 cases, 48%) was the most frequently detected genotype in this study, followed by GII.4 (6 cases, 24%), GII.13 (2 cases, 8%), GI.2 (2 cases, 8%), GI.3 (2 cases, 8%), GI.1 (1 case, 4%), and GII.2 (1 case, 4%). The kappa coefficient was 1.000 (95% CI: 1.000-1.000) for Xpert Norovirus and 0.966 (95% CI: 0.896-1.000) for TRCReady NV, indicating a strong agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Norovirus detection using Xpert Norovirus and TRCReady NV is highly useful for diagnosis and infection control because these assays are easy to operate, quick, and exhibit almost the same performance as that of real-time RT-PCR.